How HoodL2 reviews information
Last reviewed 7 Sep 2026
HoodL2 reviews claims against primary sources and records uncertainty where the evidence is incomplete. Review dates help readers assess how current a listing is.
Primary sources first
Primary references include Robinhood's documentation and contract registry, issuer prospectuses, attestations, company announcements and onchain records from explorers such as Blockscout. Independent analysis, including L2BEAT, supplies additional context. Fact records retain source URLs and retrieval dates for citation.
Multi-model cross-checking
Research can use multiple models and web search before publication. Editors check the underlying sources; agreement between models is not independent evidence. Conflicting or unsupported claims receive lower confidence or are withheld.
Confidence scores
- High confidence: multiple independent primary sources agree.
- Medium confidence: a single credible source or partial corroboration.
- Low confidence: a reported claim remains unconfirmed and carries a qualification.
Missing and disputed information
A listing may lack a contract audit, confirmed deployment address or independently checked usage figures. These gaps are recorded explicitly. Product announcements and promotional claims are distinguished from observed availability, and metrics should be read with their dates and context.
Live data, cached locally
Provider feeds supply figures such as TVL, exchange volume, stablecoin supply and block times. The site stores observations with timestamps and can display the last stored value when a provider is unavailable. Seeded reference values may be older than provider updates; a visible number alone does not establish that it is live.
Corrections
Submit a correction with a source. The updates feed records published ecosystem events and changes.
Questions about the review process
- What does the confidence score mean?
- Confidence reflects how strongly a fact is supported: high means multiple independent, primary sources agree; medium means a single credible source or partial corroboration; low means it is reported but unconfirmed. Low-confidence claims are flagged, not hidden.
- What is a named gap?
- A gap identifies information we cannot verify, such as a funding figure or team roster. The listing records what is missing or disputed so readers can assess the limits of the available evidence.
- How often is content updated?
- Provider imports run on a schedule; displayed values may come from an earlier successful update or a seeded reference. Curated profiles carry review dates. Editors assess new sources and submitted corrections, and the Pulse feed records published ecosystem updates.